|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
05100cam a2200337 4500 |
| 001 |
PPN049629867 |
| 005 |
20240426055100.0 |
| 029 |
|
|
|a FR
|b 1998NAN20015
|
| 035 |
|
|
|a thL-00080118
|
| 100 |
|
|
|a 20000508d1998 k y0frey0103 ba
|
| 101 |
0 |
|
|a fre
|d fre
|d eng
|
| 102 |
|
|
|a FR
|
| 105 |
|
|
|a a m 000yy
|
| 106 |
|
|
|a r
|
| 200 |
1 |
|
|a Analyse microéconomique du non-recours (non take-up) à certaines prestations sociales
|b Texte imprimé
|e Application à l'Allocation Parentale d'Education (APE)
|f Anne Reinstadler
|g Sous la dir. de Jean Claude Ray
|
| 210 |
|
|
|a [S.l]
|c [s.n.]
|d 1998
|
| 215 |
|
|
|a 1 vol. (520 p.)
|
| 310 |
|
|
|a Publication autorisée par le jury
|
| 320 |
|
|
|a Bibliogr. p. 495-508
|
| 328 |
|
0 |
|b Thèse de doctorat
|c Sciences économiques
|e Nancy 2
|d 1998
|
| 330 |
|
|
|a UN INDIVIDU QUI A DROIT A UNE CERTAINE PRESTATION SOCIALE, MAIS QUI N'EN BENEFICIE PAS, SE TROUVE A CE TITRE DANS UNE SITUATION ANORMALE, QUI EST QUALIFIEE DE NON-RECOURS. L'OBJET DE LA THESE EST DE METTRE EN EXERGUE LES FACTEURS EXPLICATIFS DE CE PHENOMENE, ET LA FACON DONT UN TEL COMPORTEMENT PEUT ETRE APPREHENDE. AINSI, CE COMPORTEMENT PEUT ETRE EXPLIQUE DANS LE CADRE D'UNE ANALYSE COUTS/AVANTAGES, L'INDIVIDU PRENANT LA DECISION DE NE PAS FAIRE VALOIR SES DROITS, APRES AVOIR ARBITRE ENTRE LES COUTS INDUITS PAR LA DEMANDE DE LA PRESTATION, ET LES AVANTAGES RETIRES DE SA PERCEPTION. CES COUTS SONT LIES A L'INFORMATION SUR LA PRESTATION, A LA COMPLEXITE DU PROCESSUS DE DEMANDE, AUX STIGMATES RESSENTIS PAR LE BENEFICIAIRE ; QUANT AUX AVANTAGES, ILS SONT DE NATURE FINANCIERE, RELATIFS SURTOUT AU MONTANT PERCU AU TITRE DE LA PRESTATION CONSIDEREE. L'APPLICATION DE L'ANALYSE DU NON-RECOURS A L'ALLOCATION PARENTALE D'EDUCATION (PRESTATION FAMILIALE ALLOUEE AUX PARENTS DE JEUNES ENFANTS, S'ILS NE TRAVAILLENT PAS A TEMPS PLEIN) PERMET DE METTRE EN EXERGUE D'AUTRES FACTEURS, SPECIFIQUES A CETTE PRESTATION, PARCE QU'ELLE CONTIENT UNE CONDITION DE COMPORTEMENT ATTENDU DE LA PART DES PARENTS (COMPORTEMENT D'OFFRE DE TRAVAIL) ; L'EXISTENCE DE CETTE CONDITION CONDUIT A DEFINIR UN NOUVEAU TYPE DE NON-RECOURS : LE QUASI NON-RECOURS, CONCERNANT DES PARENTS NON ELIGIBLES A L'APE, MAIS QUI AURAIENT VOLONTIERS ADOPTE LE COMPORTEMENT REQUIS S'ILS AVAIENT PRIS CONSCIENCE DES DIVERS AVANTAGES RETIRES DE LA PERCEPTION DE L'APE. L'ANALYSE EMPIRIQUE MENEE A L'AIDE D'UNE REGRESSION LOGISTIQUE INDIQUE QUE LES FACTEURS RELATIFS A L'INFORMATION ET A LA COMPLEXITE DE LA PRESTATION ONT BIEN UN ROLE DANS L'EXPLICATION DU NON-RECOURS ET DU QUASI NON-RECOURS A L'APE, ET SOULIGNE QUE CE DERNIER PHENOMENE RESULTE EFFECTIVEMENT D'UN CALCUL COUTS/AVANTAGES, QUI DOIT ETRE ENTENDU AU SENS LARGE DU TERME (INCLUANT DES ELEMENTS DE PREFERENCES GENERALES), ET NON SEULEMENT AU SENS
|
| 330 |
|
|
|a THE NON TAKE-UP OF SOCIAL BENEFITS CAN BE DEFINED AS THE FACT THAT AN INDIVIDUAL DOES NOT RECEIVE THE BENEFIT HE IS ELIGIBLE FOR. THE SCOPE OF THE PH.D. DISSERTATION IS TO LIGHTEN THE CAUSES OF THIS PHENOMENON, AND TO SHOW HOW THE BEHAVIOR OF THE INDIVIDUAL CAN BE EXPLAIN. SUCH A BEHAVIOR CAN BE EXPLAIN THROUGH A COST/BENEFIT ANALYSIS, THAT IS TO SAY THAT THE INDIVIDUAL DECIDES NOT TO TAKE UP THE BENEFIT AFTER HAVING COMPARED THE BENEFIT HE WILL RECEIVE WITH THE COSTS RELATED TO THE PROCESS OF DEMAND. THESE COSTS ARE ATTRIBUTED TO THE SEARCH FOR INFORMATION, TO THE COMPLEXITY OF THE PROCESS OF DEMAND, TO THE STIGMA THAT THE RECIPIENT COULD FEEL. THE ANALYSIS IS APPLIED TO THE ALLOCATION PARENTALE D'EDUCATION, A FRENCH BENEFIT DESIGNED TO PARENTS WITH AT LEAST TWO CHILDREN, AND WHO DO NOT WORK FULL TIME. THIS ANALYSIS ALLOWS US TO LIGHTEN SOME OTHER SPECIFIC FACTORS THAT CAN EXPLAIN ESPECIALLY THE NON TAKE-UP OF THIS BENEFIT, BECAUSE APE PRESENTS AN ELIGIBILITY CONDITION OF BEHAVIOR (TO REDUCE TIME OF WORK, IN ORDER TO AVOID BEING FULL TIME WORKER). THIS CONDITION LEADS TO DEFINE ANOTHER TYPE OF NON TAKE-UP, RELATED TO THIS CONDITION OF BEHAVIOR : THE QUASI NON TAKE-UP, THAT REFERS TO PARENTS WHO ARE NOT ELIGIBLE FOR APE, BUT WHO WOULD HAVE BEEN ADOPTING THE EXPECTED BEHAVIOR IF THEY HAD BEEN AWARE OF THE DIFFERENT ADVANTAGES RELATED TO THE BENEFIT. THE EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS (USING A LOGIT MODEL) ALLOWS US TO CONCLUDE THAT FACTORS CONCERNING THE COSTS OF INFORMATION AND COMPLEXITY CAN REALLY EXPLAIN FOR SOME PART THE NON TAKE-UP AND THE QUASI NON TAKE-UP OF APE, AND OUTLINES THAT THIS LAST PHENOMENON REALLY RESULTS OF A COST/BENEFIT COMPARISON THAT TAKES INTO ACCOUNT, INTER ALIA, FACTORS THAT ARE NOT OF FINA
|
| 541 |
| |
|
|a Analysis of the phenomenon of non take-up of social benefits
|e Application to a french benefit : the allocation parentale d'éducation
|z eng
|
| 606 |
0 |
|
|3 PPN027259250
|a Allocations familiales
|3 PPN027226794
|y France
|3 PPN027253139
|x Thèses et écrits académiques
|2 rameau
|
| 700 |
|
1 |
|3 PPN147595401
|a Reinstadler
|b Anne
|4 070
|
| 702 |
|
1 |
|3 PPN029136326
|a Ray
|b Jean-Claude
|4 727
|
| 712 |
0 |
2 |
|3 PPN026403412
|a Université de Nancy II
|c 1970-2012
|4 295
|
| 801 |
|
3 |
|a FR
|b Abes
|c 20101102
|g AFNOR
|
| 930 |
|
|
|5 441092103:408234830
|b 441092103
|a TD NANC 1998 REI
|j u
|
| 979 |
|
|
|a DEC
|
| 998 |
|
|
|a 595547
|
Nantilus