Nantilus
Intuitions of justice and the utility of desert
Le site d'éditeur indique : "Research suggests that people of all demographics have nuanced and sophisticated notions of justice. The core of those judgments is often intuition rather than reason. Should the criminal law heed what principles are embodied in those deep seated judgments? In...
Enregistré dans:
| Auteur principal : | |
|---|---|
| Format : | Livre |
| Langue : | anglais |
| Titre complet : | Intuitions of justice and the utility of desert / Paul H. Robinson |
| Publié : |
Oxford, New York :
Oxford University Press
, cop. 2013 |
| Description matérielle : | 1 vol. (XXIII-559 p.) |
| Sujets : |
| LEADER | 04586cam a2200421 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | PPN172751411 | ||
| 003 | http://www.sudoc.fr/172751411 | ||
| 005 | 20220511055400.0 | ||
| 010 | |a 978-0-19-991772-3 |b rel. | ||
| 010 | |a 0-19-991772-8 |b rel. | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)863130145 | ||
| 073 | 0 | |a 9780199917723 | |
| 100 | |a 20131106h20132013k y0frey0103 ba | ||
| 101 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 102 | |a GB | ||
| 105 | |a a z 001yy | ||
| 106 | |a r | ||
| 181 | |6 z01 |c txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 181 | 1 | |6 z01 |a i# |b xxxe## | |
| 182 | |6 z01 |c n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 182 | 1 | |6 z01 |a n | |
| 183 | |6 z01 |a nga |2 RDAfrCarrier | ||
| 200 | 1 | |a Intuitions of justice and the utility of desert |f Paul H. Robinson | |
| 210 | |a Oxford |a New York |c Oxford University Press |d cop. 2013 | ||
| 215 | |a 1 vol. (XXIII-559 p.) |c ill. |d 24 cm | ||
| 320 | |a Notes bibliogr. Index | ||
| 330 | |a Le site d'éditeur indique : "Research suggests that people of all demographics have nuanced and sophisticated notions of justice. The core of those judgments is often intuition rather than reason. Should the criminal law heed what principles are embodied in those deep seated judgments? In Intuitions of Justice and the Utility of Desert, Paul H. Robinson demonstrates that criminal law rules that deviate from public conceptions of justice and desert can seriously undermine the American criminal justice system's integrity and credibility by failing to recognize or meet the needs of the communities it serves. Professor Robinson sketches the contours of a wide range of lay conceptions of what criminals justly deserve, touching upon many issues that penal code drafters or policy makers must face, including normative crime control, culpability, grading, sentencing, justification and excuse defenses, principles of adjudication, and judicial discretion. He warns that compromising the American criminal justice system to satisfy other interests can uncover the hidden costs incurred when a community's notions about justice are not reflected in its criminal laws. Intuitions of Justice and the Utility of Desert shows that by ignoring the views of justice held by the communities they serve, legislators, policymakers, and judges undermine the relevance of the criminal justice system and reduce its strength and credibility, creating a gap between what justice a community needs and what justice a court or law prescribes." | ||
| 359 | 2 | |b Preface and Acknowledgments |b Selected Robinson Bibliography |b Part I. The Nature of Judgments About Justice |c Chapter 1. Judgments About Justice as Intuitional and Nuanced |c Chapter 2. Judgments About Justice as a Human Universal: Agreements on a Core of Wrongdoing |c Chapter 3. The Origins of Shared Intuitions of Justice |c Chapter 4. Disagreements About Justice |c Chapter 5. Changing People's Judgments of Justice |b Part II. Should the Criminal Law Care What the Lay Person Thinks Is Just? |c Chapter 6. Current Law's Deference to Lay Judgments of Justice |c Chapter 7. Current Law's Conflicts with Lay Judgments of Justice |c Chapter 8. Normative Crime Control: The Utility of Desert |c Chapter 9. Building Moral Credibility and the Disutility of Injustice |c Chapter 10. Deviations from Empirical Desert |c Chapter 11. Implications for Criminal Justice and Other Reform |b Part III. The Content of Lay Judgments of Justice |c Chapter 12. Rules of Conduct: Doctrines of Criminalization |c Chapter 13. Rules of Conduct: Doctrines of Justification |c Chapter 14. Principles of Adjudication: Doctrines of Culpability |c Chapter 15. Principles of Adjudication: Doctrines of Excuse |c Chapter 16. Principles of Adjudication: Doctrines of Grading |c Chapter 17. Law-Community Agreement and Conflict, and Its Implications |b Part IV. Empirical Studies of Lay Judgments of Justice as a Law and Policy Tool |c Chapter 18. Explaining History: Shifting Views of Criminality |c Chapter 19. Testing Competing Theories: Blackmail |c Chapter 20. Testing Competing Theories: Justification Defenses |c Chapter 21. Guiding Judicial Discretion: Extralegal Punishment Factors |c Chapter 22. Intuitions of Justice & the Utility of Desert | |
| 606 | |3 PPN027466892 |a Droit pénal |3 PPN027295206 |x Philosophie |2 rameau | ||
| 606 | |3 PPN027466892 |a Droit pénal |3 PPN027519511 |x Opinion publique |2 rameau | ||
| 606 | |3 PPN027466892 |a Droit pénal |3 PPN027791157 |x Aspect moral |2 rameau | ||
| 686 | |a GB |2 local_cujas | ||
| 700 | 1 | |3 PPN12379756X |a Robinson |b Paul H. |f 1948-.... |4 070 | |
| 801 | 3 | |a FR |b Abes |c 20220510 |g AFNOR | |
| 979 | |a DEC | ||
| 930 | |5 441092103:726937916 |b 441092103 |j u | ||
| 992 | |5 441092103:726937916 |a 345.01 |2 Dewey adaptée pour le DCS | ||
| 998 | |a 926316 | ||