Intuitions of justice and the utility of desert

Intuitions of justice and the utility of desert

Le site d'éditeur indique : "Research suggests that people of all demographics have nuanced and sophisticated notions of justice. The core of those judgments is often intuition rather than reason. Should the criminal law heed what principles are embodied in those deep seated judgments? In...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal : Robinson Paul H. (Auteur)
Format : Livre
Langue : anglais
Titre complet : Intuitions of justice and the utility of desert / Paul H. Robinson
Publié : Oxford, New York : Oxford University Press , cop. 2013
Description matérielle : 1 vol. (XXIII-559 p.)
Sujets :
Droit pénal > Philosophie
Droit pénal > Opinion publique
Droit pénal > Aspect moral
  • Preface and Acknowledgments
  • Selected Robinson Bibliography
  • Part I. The Nature of Judgments About Justice
  • Chapter 1. Judgments About Justice as Intuitional and Nuanced
  • Chapter 2. Judgments About Justice as a Human Universal: Agreements on a Core of Wrongdoing
  • Chapter 3. The Origins of Shared Intuitions of Justice
  • Chapter 4. Disagreements About Justice
  • Chapter 5. Changing People's Judgments of Justice
  • Part II. Should the Criminal Law Care What the Lay Person Thinks Is Just?
  • Chapter 6. Current Law's Deference to Lay Judgments of Justice
  • Chapter 7. Current Law's Conflicts with Lay Judgments of Justice
  • Chapter 8. Normative Crime Control: The Utility of Desert
  • Chapter 9. Building Moral Credibility and the Disutility of Injustice
  • Chapter 10. Deviations from Empirical Desert
  • Chapter 11. Implications for Criminal Justice and Other Reform
  • Part III. The Content of Lay Judgments of Justice
  • Chapter 12. Rules of Conduct: Doctrines of Criminalization
  • Chapter 13. Rules of Conduct: Doctrines of Justification
  • Chapter 14. Principles of Adjudication: Doctrines of Culpability
  • Chapter 15. Principles of Adjudication: Doctrines of Excuse
  • Chapter 16. Principles of Adjudication: Doctrines of Grading
  • Chapter 17. Law-Community Agreement and Conflict, and Its Implications
  • Part IV. Empirical Studies of Lay Judgments of Justice as a Law and Policy Tool
  • Chapter 18. Explaining History: Shifting Views of Criminality
  • Chapter 19. Testing Competing Theories: Blackmail
  • Chapter 20. Testing Competing Theories: Justification Defenses
  • Chapter 21. Guiding Judicial Discretion: Extralegal Punishment Factors
  • Chapter 22. Intuitions of Justice & the Utility of Desert